Legal Opinion
Castleman v. Belt
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided December 24, 1841PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Assumpsit. Error to the Franklin Circuit. Case 60.
1Opinion of the Court
Ciiief Justice Robertson
delivered the Opinion of the Court.
David Castleman (the plaintiff in error,) seeks the reversal of a judgment rendered against him on agreed facts, in an action of assumpsit, for use and occupation, brought by him against Osburn Belt and Joseph Belt.
The facts, as agreed, are substantially these: one Bacon, having mortgaged a house in Frankfort to Castle-man, afterwards mortgaged it to one Philips, who brought a suit in chancery against Bacon and Castleman for foreclosure and sale, Bacon, by himself and tenant, having continued to retain the possession and enjoy the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Paul Mik, Jr. v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Watt's Administrator v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Hutsell v. Deposit Bank of ParisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
- Lathrop v. NelsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1877
- Weber v. C & C Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934