Legal Opinion

ADAMS v. MAGNUSSON

District Court, D. Maine

Decided May 24, 2021No. 1:19-cv-00547Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JON R. ADAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:19-cv-00547-GZS ) MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, et al., ) ) Defendants ) ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff moves to amend his complaint to include several additional factual assertions in support of his claims. (Motion to Amend, ECF No. 72; Proposed Amended Complaint, ECF No. 75.) Defendants oppose the motion. Following review of the parties’ arguments and the record, the Court denies the motion. STANDARD OF REVIEW Rule 15(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Steir v. Girl Scouts of the USACourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  3. Acosta-Mestre v. Hilton International of Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  4. El-Hajj v. Fortis Benefits Ins. Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2001
  5. Johnson v. Spencer Press of Maine, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API