Legal Opinion

State v. Kinard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1981No. 8126SC390PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The defendant first challenges the admissibility of the identification evidence. At voir dire upon defendant’s motion to suppress identification testimony, Katie Glenn and her boyfriend, Willie Simpson, testified that about 8:30 a.m. they were in the duplex apartment adjoining that of Virginia Potts when they saw a young black man pulling on the door of the Potts apartment. They observed him for two or three minutes from a distance of several feet. When Simpson went out the back door, the man left, and, while walking away, looked back at them about five times.

Simpson took Ms.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . BehrmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McDoulett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. McDoulett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Opinion No. (2005), Nebraska Attorney General Reports2005
  5. State v. WestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API