Legal Opinion

Carolina, C. & O. Ry. v. Worley

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 21, 1915No. 9136PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Before Smith; J., Spartanburg, April, 1915. Proceedings under Civil Code 1912, sec. 3508, by Carolina, Clinchfield and Ohio Railway of South Carolina, against J. V. Worley.

Read the full summary

Before Smith; J., Spartanburg, April, 1915. Proceedings under Civil Code 1912, sec. 3508, by Carolina, Clinchfield and Ohio Railway of South Carolina, against J. V. Worley. From an order on proceedings in certiorari, affirming the order of the magistrate’s Court, the defendant appeals on the following exceptions: 1. Because his Honor erred in not sustaining the second ground of demurrer to the notice, as follows: Because it appears from the affidavit'that the alleged landlord is acting in violation of the terms of its charter and the condemnation proceedings by which said premises were…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

1 This appeal questions the jurisdiction of the magistrate’s Court to eject the defendant from certain premises in Spartanburg county at the suit of the Carolina, Clinchfield and Ohio Railway of South Carolina. The magistrate gave judgment in favor of the petitioner, a writ of certiorari was sued out and case heard on return to the writ in the Court of Common Pleas, and judgment of magistrate’s Court affirmed. From this judgment, defendant appealed. Exceptions 3, 4, 5, and 6 question the sufficiency of the testimony, and a writ of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Charles v. ByrdSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888
  2. Morris v. PalmerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API