Legal Opinion

Barnett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 19, 1969No. 41876PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of marihuana; the punishment, ten years.

The evidence reflects that one hundred grams of marihuana were found in an attache or brief case belonging to appellant. The first two complaints were that physical evidence was obtained as a result of an illegal arrest; and, that oral statements made by appellant were inadmissible and consent to search was not voluntary because he was under an illegal arrest and was not given warnings that he had a right to counsel and a right to remain silent under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Balch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. DeVoyle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Marshburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. McElwee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API