Legal Opinion

(PC) Head v. County of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 6, 2022No. 2:19-cv-01663Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES HEAD, No. 2: 19-cv-1663 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil action. For the 19 reasons stated herein, the August 25, 2022 order to show cause (ECF No. 124) is discharged; the 20 previously vacated motions (ECF Nos. 87, 89, 90, 94, 101) are reinstated; plaintiff’s motion to 21 stay (ECF No. 101) is denied; defendant Endrizzi’s motion to compel (ECF No. 87) is granted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Harris v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Baker v. WinterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API