Legal Opinion · Dissent

Farris v. Daigle

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 28, 1995No. 93-605Published

1DissentThayer, J.

I disagree with the majority’s consideration of issues not properly before this court, and I disagree with its holding that the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to consider evidence submitted by the plaintiff in support of a motion for reconsideration. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

The sole issue in this case is whether the trial court’s refusal to consider new evidence when ruling on the plaintiffs motion to reconsider was an abuse of discretion. While it is true, as the majority notes, that the procedural history in this case is unusual, the events prior to the trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  2. White v. FrancoeurSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  3. Abrams v. AbramsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  4. Fortin v. Manchester Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API