Legal Opinion

Fidelity and Deposit Company v. Edward E. Gillen Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 3, 2019No. 18-2144 & 18-3446PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brennan, Circuit Judge.

Although linguists call Latin a "dead language," legal nomenclature dies hard. This case presents a surety's claim for quia timet -equitable protection from probable future harm. The surety (an insurance company) is suing its principal (a construction company) that allegedly went belly up on a government project. The ancient equitable doctrine of quia timet remains viable into the 21st century, but the surety's claim in this case is a dead letter.

*321 I. Background

The relevant facts are straightforward and undisputed. About ten years ago, the Public Building Commission of…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. NewSpin Sports, LLC v. Arrow Electronics, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Eric White v. UALCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  2. Mary Rodgers-Rouzier v. American Queen Steamboat Operating Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  3. Lashon Jacks v. DirectSat USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  4. National Medical Care, Inc. v. EspirituDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2003
  5. Beaumont Medical Center Hotel, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API