Fidelity and Deposit Company v. Edward E. Gillen Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Brennan, Circuit Judge.
Although linguists call Latin a "dead language," legal nomenclature dies hard. This case presents a surety's claim for quia timet -equitable protection from probable future harm. The surety (an insurance company) is suing its principal (a construction company) that allegedly went belly up on a government project. The ancient equitable doctrine of quia timet remains viable into the 21st century, but the surety's claim in this case is a dead letter.
*321 I. Background
The relevant facts are straightforward and undisputed. About ten years ago, the Public Building Commission of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- NewSpin Sports, LLC v. Arrow Electronics, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Eric White v. UALCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Mary Rodgers-Rouzier v. American Queen Steamboat Operating Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- Lashon Jacks v. DirectSat USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- National Medical Care, Inc. v. EspirituDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2003
- Beaumont Medical Center Hotel, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.