Legal Opinion · Dissent

Doyle v. Central Louisiana Ambulatory Surgical Center

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 1993No. 92-1363Published

1DissentKnoll, Judge

The majority holds that since Mrs. Doyle litigated her claim against Piccadilly only, and since Piccadilly, the doctors and the Central Louisiana Ambulatory Surgical Center, Inc. are solidarily obligated, this serves as a bar to Mrs. Doyle’s recovery on her medical malpractice claim. I do not agree.

Mrs. Doyle did not release any of the defendants in her medical malpractice claim, therefore, she is entitled to proceed against them. Weber v. Charity Hosp. of Louisiana, 475 So.2d 1047 (La.1985).

Steptoe v. Lallie Kemp Regional Hosp., 618 So.2d 1008 (La.App. 1st Cir.1993) held that a subsequent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weber v. Charity Hosp. of LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  2. Steptoe v. Lallie Kemp Regional HospitalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API