Legal Opinion

Hamade v. Combs

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 6, 1987No. 85-374PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHORES, Justice.

This is a boundary line dispute between coterminous landowners. There was some conflict in the evidence, one side contending that the true line was some two to three feet east of where the other contended it was. The trial court appointed a surveyor, who established the line by using the description in old deeds and monuments on the ground. After viewing the property, the trial court entered a decree fixing the line pursuant to the survey. The disappointed side appealed. We affirm.

A decree establishing a boundary line between coterminous lands on evidence submitted ore tenus…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Smith v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Evans v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  4. Ray v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crowden v. GrantlandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API