Legal Opinion

Northern Tankers (Cyprus) Ltd. v. Backstrom

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 14, 1997No. 3:95 CV 1217(GLG)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOETTEL, District Judge.

In our June 5, 1997 opinion, we found that defendants Magnus Lindholm (“Lindholm”) and Adam Backstrom (“Backstrom”) (collectively “defendants”) had committed such “wanton and wilful malicious misconduct” so as to warrant an award of punitive damages on plaintiffs sixth and tenth causes of action, involving conspiracies to fraudulently transfer assets. We therefore granted leave to plaintiff to move for punitive damages. While we adhere to our factual finding that defendants’ conduct constituted “wanton and wilful malicious misconduct,” and while we believe that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Austin v. BarrowsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
  2. Derderian v. DerderianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Crepeau v. GronagerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. Cowles v. DaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Deborah Klein v. Douglas WeidnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. Dfs Secured Healthcare Receivables Trust v. Caregivers Great Lakes, Inc. And Marc LeestmaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Rountree v. Nunnery (In Re Rountree)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
  4. Georgia Receivables v. Caregivers Great LakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API