Legal Opinion
Mobay Chemical Co. v. Hudson Foam Plastics Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 1, 1967No. Civ. 128-327PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUGARMAN, Chief Judge.
John H. Sutherland moves pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., for an order modifying certain injunctions entered in Civil Action No. 128-327. Defendants in that action, Hudson Foam Plastics Corporation, Hudson Foam Latex Products, Inc., Shuffman International, Inc., Hudson Cush-N-Foam Corporation, Oscar D. Shuffman, and Fred Shuffman, oppose the motion.
In Civil Action No. 128-327, movant, together with others, served as legal counsel for plaintiffs Mobay Chemical Company and Farbenfabriken Bayer Aktiengesellsehaft. By an order…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Alemite Mfg. Corporation v. StaffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Security Insurance Company Of New Haven v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kem Manufacturing Corporation v. Ray J. Wilder, and Rjw, Incorporated, Harold J. Gaines, Non-Party Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Western Steel Erection Company, a Corporation v. United States of America, Morris L. Dunlap and Donald M. Fitzgerald, Applicants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Wright v. COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF GREENSVILLE CTY., VA.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1970
- Ex Parte OvertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- In the Matter of El Paso Refinery, Lp, Debtor. Andrews & Kurth L.L.P. v. Wright Killen & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.