Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Greenway

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

“What dire offense from amorous causes springs!
“What mighty contests rise from trivial things!” 1

There is no serious dispute but that it was defendant’s Angus who, in 1960, had Happy Hollow holidays, siring seven calves. Mr. Greenway seems to accept vicarious liability, under sec. 172.01, Stats., for that which Angus wrought. The principal question on appeal is whether there is evidence in the record to support the finding that Angus’ efforts caused the deaths of Lena, Lindis and Margarett and destroyed the capacity of Kolleen, Lilac and Lavender to perform as demanded in bovine society.

It is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Atco Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Vates v. CorneliusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Luke v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Arnold N. May Builders, Inc. v. BrukettaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. City of Cedarburg Light & Water Commission v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Peterson v. GreenwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State ex rel. Greenway v. County Court of St. Croix CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API