Legal Opinion
Arthur v. Kuchar
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 17, 1996Published
1Opinion of the Court
546 Pa. 12 (1996)
682 A.2d 1250
Darlene ARTHUR
v.
Carol KUCHAR and Debra Spaeder.
Appeal of Debra SPAEDER.
Darlene ARTHUR
v.
Carol KUCHAR and Debra Spaeder.
Appeal of Carol KUCHAR.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued March 5, 1996.
Decided September 17, 1996.
James David Elder, Pittsburgh, for Debra Spaeder.
Gary A. Falatovich, Greensburg, for Carol Kuchar.
H. Reginald Belden, Jr., Greensburg, for Darlene Arthur.
Before FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO and NEWMAN, JJ.
OPINION OF THE COURT
NEWMAN, Justice.
Debra Spaeder (Spaeder) and Carol Kuchar (Kuchar) appeal from the February 13, 1995 Order of the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Wiegand v. WiegandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Craig v. Magee Memorial Rehabilitation CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Hawthorne v. Dravo Corp., Keystone Div.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.