Legal Opinion

Joseph Dixon v. United States of America

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided January 8, 2026No. 3:21-cv-01437Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JOSEPH DIXON, Petitioner, v. Case No. 21-1437-NJR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSENSTENGEL, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Joseph Dixon’s motion to vacate his conviction and sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. 1). Dixon contends that he received ineffective assistance from his trial counsel in violation of his Sixth Amendment rights, principally because his attorney did not appeal his judgment despite his express instruction to do so. The Court…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Tennard v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. United States v. Robert Schuh, Lisa Nolen, and Curtis LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API