Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Pacific Mutual Sales Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 2, 1956No. C. D. 1758Published

1Concurrence

CONCURRING OPINION

Johnson, Judge:

I concur in the result reached by my associate and submit in support of my conclusion the following:

The question before the court involves the proper classification of merchandise described on the invoices as “Canned Prepared Top Shells” and entered as “Prepared Shellfish (Sazai).” According to the stipulation, it is a marine snail belonging to the Turbinidae family, known as Turbo (Batillus) Cornutus Solander, a gastropod mollusk which creeps on the floor of the ocean. A shell of one of the creatures was received in evidence as plaintiff’s illustrative…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. H. Bayersdorfer & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. De Jonghe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. United States v. LarzelereCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. White v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  5. State ex rel. White v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API