Legal Opinion

Holdrige v. Scott

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1869PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Present — Daniels, Marvin and Lamont, JJ.

*304By the Court

Lamont, J.

An order was made at Special Term on the motion of defendant, who obtained a verdict herein, charging the plaintiff with costs personally, from which plaintiff appeals to the General Term.

The question is, whether the Code (§ 317) has changed the law, as it before stood, in such a manner, that an executor or administrator prosecuting an action in his representative capacity, and failing in the suit, is exempted, personally, from liability for costs in all cases, unless the court shall personally charge him therefor, on the score of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Bailey v. Judges of the Albany Mayor's CourtNew York Supreme Court · 1833
  2. Ketchum v. KetchumNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  3. Administrators of Tilton v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1814
  4. Barker v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  5. Chamberlin v. SpencerNew York Supreme Court · 1825

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mullen v. GuinnNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Bedell v. BarnesNew York Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Fox v. FoxNew York Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Hone v. De PeysterNew York Supreme Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API