Legal Opinion

Livingston v. Kerbaugh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1906No. Appeal, No. 24PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 24, March T., 1906, by plaintiff, from order of O. P. Cumberland Co., May T., 1905, No. 7, striking off judgment in case of George Livingston v. H. S. Kerbaugh, Incorporated. Rule to strike off judgment. Before Sadler, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was the order striking off the judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Head, J.,

The disposition of this case requires the consideration and determination of but a single question. Was the construction of one of its own rules by the learned court below so palpably erroneous and injurious to the appellant as to warrant a reversal of the decree complained of ? There is nothing in this record that demands a discussion of those general powers to make rules governing the transaction of their own business inherent in all courts of record, or expressly conferred by our own act *536of 1836. Nor would, it be useful or profitable to attempt to define or classify the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gannon v. FritzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  2. Higgins Carpet Co. v. LatimerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Wickersham v. RussellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
  4. Marlin v. WatersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. Coleman v. NantzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Donoghue v. O'KaneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  2. Sork v. C. Trevor Dunham, Inc.Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API