Alla Anatolyevna Zorikova v. Kineticflix LLC
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 g Anited States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 | ALLA ANATOLYEVNA ZORIKOVA, Case Ne 2:19-CV-04214-ODW (GJSx) 12 Plaintiff, B ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT V. KINETICFLIX, LLC’S MOTION TO 14 GINETI CFLIX, LLC. DISMISS [30, 33, 38, 44, 48] 1D Defendants. 16 17 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 Presently before the Court is Defendant Kineticflix, LLC’s (“Kineticflix”) 21 || Motion to Dismiss for insufficient process and insufficient service of process. (Mot. 22 || to Dismiss (“Mot.”), ECF Nos. 30.) For the reasons below, the Court DENIES 23 || Kineticflix’s Motion. ' 24 HW.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ronald B. Brockmeyer Eromedia, Ltd. v. David C. May v. Marquis Publications, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Mark E. O'Brien v. R.J. O'Brien & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Internet Solutions for Business Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United Food Workers Union, Locals 197, 373, 428, 588, 775, 839, 870, 1119, 1179 & 1532 v. Alpha Beta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- LeDonne v. Gulf Air, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.