Shamhart v. Morrison Cafeteria Company

I regret that I am compelled to dissent to the Court’s opinion prepared by Mr. Justice ADAMS.

I am unable to conclude that Morrison Cafeteria is doing anything wrong toward plaintiff.

It is a maxim of law that one should so use his property as to not injure another but every inconvenience, discomfort, and annoyance is not a nuisance.

The annoyance to the plaintiff is not from the restaurateur but from the public who are the patrons apparently because of the excellent qualities of the food served.

I fail to see that Morrison Cafeteria has done more than use its property as others in like…