Legal Opinion

People v. Bull

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided August 11, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Judgment of conviction rendered December 12, 2001 affirmed.

The 11 defendants-appellants herein, self-proclaimed anarchists, were convicted after a nonjury trial of loitering (Penal Law § 240.35 [4])1 upon proof, now unchallenged on either sufficiency or weight of the evidence grounds, that they and others gathered next to each other “as a group” and covered their faces with bandanas while shouting epithets and political slogans during a May Day demonstration in Union Square Park.

Defendants’ constitutional challenges to the antimask provisions of Penal Law § 240.35 (4) are…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. KohutNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. People v. DevinnyNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. People v. AboafCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2001

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. StevensWatertown City Court · 2006
  2. People v. AyalaNew York Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. Vanderpool (Rafael)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API