Legal Opinion
O'DONNELL v. Pabst Brewing Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.
Appellants’ first contention is that under the June, 1957, contract their seniority rights were established during the life of the contract and could not be changed in mid-term. They cite the contract provision that “no other subjects will be opened for bargaining during its term or until an extension or renewal of this contract shall be opened for bargaining,” and the termination clause which provided for automatic renewal on June 1, 1959, unless either party gave notice to the other, sixty days prior thereto, of its desire to terminate or modify the agreement. The purpose of the so-called…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 727 v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Grand Lodge of the Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Girard Lodge No. 100Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Leeder v. Cities Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Belanger v. Local Division No. 1128, Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach EmployeesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Truck Drivers and Helpers, Local Union 568, Affiliated With International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. And Union of Transportation Employees, Truck Drivers and Helpers, Local Union 568, Affiliated With International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Markham v. American Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Truck Drivers & Helpers, Local Union 568 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967