Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Bacon

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

FROM WASHINGTON. Error to Law Court, Washington County. — Dana Harmon, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

delivered tlae opinion of the Court.

This suit was brought to recover the value of certain live stock shipped under a limited liability contract. When the animals reached the place of destination, Baltimore, five were dead.

The provision of the contract under which the controversy arises was as follows:

“That as a condition precedent to any right to recover any damages for loss or injury to said live stock, •notice in writing of the claim therefor shall he given to the agent of the carrier actually delivering said live stock, whenever such delivery may he made, and such notice shall be so given…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Patterson v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Kansas & Arkansas Valley Railroad v. AyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. I. FrogleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Pierson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Warfield & LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Individual Healthcare Specialists, Inc. v. Bluecross Blueshield of Tennessee, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Commerce Street Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  3. Stovall v. DattelCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  4. Ernst v. CondittCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
  5. Jett v. Southern Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API