Glover v. State

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

DICE, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing, appellant insists that we were in error in holding that the issue of his execution of the bond in question was not raised by a plea of non est factum.

Appellant insists that his verified amended answer, in which he challenged the validity of the bond together with his sworn testimony given on the hearing of the verified motion for new *158trial denying execution of the same, was tantamount to a plea of non est factum.

While in his amended answer appellant alleged that the bond was invalid for various reasons, he did not, as…