Legal Opinion
United States v. Lawrence Braico and Ronald Routa, United States of America v. Fred Demaio
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 18, 1970No. 17298, 17364PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge. 1
This is an appeal from convictions entered against the three appellants. The charges stem from the sale in Chicago of goods stolen in Iowa.
Two of the appellants, Mr. Braico and Mr. Routa, were convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 2315 by receiving stolen property; the third appellant, Mr. De-Maio, was convicted of the same crime, but he was charged in a separate count of the indictment. In addition, all of the appellants, together with Mr. Fernandez, a seller of the stolen property, were convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 371, by conspiring to violate § 2315.
The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. BorelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- United States v. VarelliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Joseph AmabileCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. BascaroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Oscar Mancillas and Charles LowryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Jason HouserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. William DaddanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Edward A. Greer and Alphonse P. BartkusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.