Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Ballestas
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JANE BLAND, Justice.
A bank lost a trial against the owners of a home because it failed to prove that it owned the note on which it sought to foreclose. The bank then sued the owners again, contending once more that it owned the disputed note. The owners responded that the bank’s claims are barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel. The trial court agreed and granted summary judgment.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee under the pooling and servicing agreement dated as of November 1, 2004 asset-backed pass-through certificates series 2004-WHQ2 (“Wells Fargo”), appeals the trial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. FieldingTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. JoachimTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Austin Nursing Center, Inc. v. LovatoTexas Supreme Court · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- SGK Properties, L.L.C. v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Dernier v. Mortgage Network, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Martin v. New Century Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Miller v. Homecomings Financial, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Skelton v. Urban Trust BankDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.