Legal Opinion

In re Modjeska

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 20, 1987Published

1Opinion of the Court

Curiam.

Petitioner moves for an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys, in accordance with Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), on the ground that respondent has been convicted of a felony.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this court in 1971. On October 1, 1987, he pleaded guilty in the County Court of Ulster County to the following felonies: forgery in the second degree, two counts, grand larceny in the second degree, three counts, and scheme to defraud in the first degree, one count. He is presently awaiting sentencing on these convictions.

*767Respondent ceased to be an attorney…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re GinsbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. In re CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. In re LeydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API