Legal Opinion

Benedict v. Caffe

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided May 13, 1854PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBy the Court. Slosson, J.

In this case the plaintiff having recovered a verdict, I allowed the defendants time to make a case, but with privilege to the plaintiff to enter his judgment as security.

One of the defendants, originally, was Henry Laverty, second endorser of the note sued upon, who answered the complaint and died before trial, and the suit was continued under § 121 of the Code against his executrix.

A motion is now made—

I. (By all the defendants) that the order made by me, so far as it allows the plaintiff to enter his judgment, be vacated, on the supposition that after judgment it is too late to move for a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leggett v. DuboisNew York Court of Chancery · 1830

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Merritt v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Barnes v. RobertsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1859
  3. Tindal v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Burnham v. HarrisonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1878
  5. Williams v. Tradesmen's Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1865

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API