Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rose v. Paape

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 1, 1970No. [No. 70, September Term, 1959.]PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrune, C. J.

This is an appeal by the respondents, Joseph E. Rose and wife, from two portions of a decree of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County entered in a suit brought by Ronald C. Paape and' wife, against the Roses and the Board of County Commissioners of Anne Arundel County (the Board) first, for a declaration that a rezoning ordinance of the Board dated April 15, 1958, was void, second for an injunction against the Roses and the Board prohibiting them from using or permitting the use of properties of the Roses for purposes other than those permitted under zoning regulations in force…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wakefield v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Baylis v. CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORECourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. Clunet ex rel. ClunetCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1865

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Fraidin v. WeitzmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Treadway v. City of RockfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Pressman v. CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORECourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Montgomery County v. National Capital Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API