Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Georges

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 29, 2011No. 1-10-1152PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE ROBERT E. GORDON

delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion.

Justice McBride concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Cahill dissented, with opinion.

OPINION

This matter is before us to determine whether defendant, Mara Georges, in her official capacity as the corporation counsel of the City of Chicago (Corporation Counsel), is required to produce unredacted copies of documents that she claims are shielded by the attorney-client privilege to Joseph Ferguson, in his official capacity as inspector general of the City of Chicago (Inspector General). After the Inspector General…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Van Meter v. Darien Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Environmental Protection Agency v. Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Morr-Fitz, Inc. v. BlagojevichIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In Re Information to Discipline Certain Attorneys of SanitaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fox Moraine, LLC v. United City of YorkvilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  2. Ferguson v. PattonIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Fox Moraine v. United City of YorkvilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. Ferguson v. GeorgesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API