Legal Opinion

W. J. Morgan & Co. v. Quo Vadis Amusement Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for judgment on the answer as frivolous.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

The action is for sequestration of defendant corporation's property and the appointment of a receiver. The complaint, among other things, alleges the entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendant corporation, the issuing of execution thereon and the return of the same wholly unsatisfied. The answer alleges that defendant corporation has no knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the entry of the judgment and the issuing and return of the execution unsatisfied. The answer, as a separate defense, further alleges the commencement of dissolution proceedings, which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Batterman v. Journal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1899
  2. McLean v. Julien Electric Co.The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rochkind v. PerlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Horvath v. BrettschneiderNew York City Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API