Legal Opinion

City of Hammond v. Cipich Ex Rel. Skowronek

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 2003No. 45A03-0204-CV-116PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

The City of Hammond, Indiana (Hammond), defendant below, appeals the trial court's grant of the motion to correct error filed on behalf of Joseph Cipich (Cipich), plaintiff below, following a jury verdict in favor of Hammond. Hammond also appeals the trial court's earlier denial of its motions for summary judgment and for judgment on the evidence. We reverse.

Issues

Hammond identifies seven issues, which we consolidate and restate as (1) whether the trial court appropriately denied Hammond's motions for summary judgment and for judgment on the evidence; and (2)…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. James Walker v. The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. Betty J. Archie v. City of Racine, Ronald W. Chiapete, and George W. GieseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cavens v. ZaberdacIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Savieo v. City of New HavenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. City of Warsaw v. OrbanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. City of Muncie Ex Rel. Muncie Fire Department v. WeidnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Putnam County Sheriff v. PriceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API