Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Farrior v. Farrior

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 24, 1999No. 93,329Published

1Concurrence

I concur with the majority. I write to address Justice Anstead's dissent in which he refers to this Court's "enlightened decision" in Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980), as a reason to uphold the trial court's decision in this case. Dissenting op. at 13. Although Canakaris recognizes the discretion of a trial judge in the difficult decisions often presented in a dissolution case, we also observed in Canakaris that:

The discretionary power that is exercised by a trial judge is not, however, without limitation, and both appellate and trial judges should recognize the concern…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Barner v. BarnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API