Legal Opinion

McDonald v. McDonald

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Delta. Foreclosure. Defendant Booth appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The bill in this cause was filed in the county of Delta, to foreclose certain mortgages. The bill was filed June 19, 1877, and the defendant Booth was advertised as a non-resident, and never served with process. His *45default was entered and a final decree rendered. The bill contains distinct averments, showing the title of the lands to have become regularly vested in Booth by record conveyance.

In March, 1880, the decree not having been carried out by sale, Booth filed his petition and noticed a motion for leave to appear. The complainant was allowed to introduce his own affidavit, to the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Guerrero v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. City of Detroit v. Detroit City Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1893
  3. Puffer v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. McDowell v. Mecosta Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API