Legal Opinion

People v. Horowitz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1967PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.

The defendant pleaded guilty after his motion to suppress alleged illegally obtained evidence and an inculpatory statement made by himself had been denied. At the hearing, the arresting officer testified that he was informed by a lieutenant from the Criminal Investigation Bureau that an anonymous phone call had been received informing the lieutenant that a described man named Bernie Horowitz was then shaping up for work at the mail room of the New York Times Building and had in his possession a brown paper bag containing stolen United States savings bonds and pornographic literature; that he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. People v. Ramirez-PortorealNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. BrnjaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. HavelkaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. ElwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API