Guilmont's Admr. v. Central Vermont Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Case for negligence. Plea, tbe general issue. Trial by jury at tbe September Term, 1907, Washington County, Waterman, J., presiding. Verdict directed for tbe defendant, and judgment tbereon. Tbe plaintiff excepted. Tbe opinion states tbe case.
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Tbe plaintiff is tbe administrator of tbe estate of Israel G-uilmont deceased. Tbis action was brought under tbe statute to recover, for tbe benefit of tbe wife and next of kin of tbe plaintiff’s intestate; their damages on account of his *267death alleged to have been caused by the wrongful act or neglect of the defendant company. This ease was twice tried. On the first trial exceptions were taken by the defendant and the case having been heard in this Court on such exceptions, it was held that, on the evidence, a verdict should have been directed for the defendant. See this case, 78 Vt. 185.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Van Dyke v. ColeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
- Stacy v. Vermont Central RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
- State v. Franklin County Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1902
- Amsden v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1895
- Barker v. Belknap's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1866
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Perkins v. Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Spaulding v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- Steen v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Barclay v. Wetmore & Morse Granite Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.