Legal Opinion
Miller v. United States
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided July 19, 1935No. 1670PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
On the 18th day of June, 1935, plaintiff caused a summons to be served upon the defendant by delivery of a copy thereof to an assistant district aitorney. It was intended by this means to commence an action for recovery under a war risk insurance policy previously issued to the plaintiff. The aforementioned date was the last day upon which the action could be commenced. Defendant has moved to vacate the service of the summons.
The World War Veterans’ Act 1924, § 19, as amended (38 USCA § 445), provides that, in suits brought under the act, the procedure shall be the same…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Walton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- National Casket Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
- Cassarello v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1919
3Cited by8 opinions
- Munro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1936
- Henry v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1936
- Spencer v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1936
- Bates Mfg. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.