Legal Opinion

Castrogivanni v. Target Stores, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 17, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated October 17, 2002, as granted the motion of the defendants Target Stores, Inc., and Kimko Realty Corporation, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and that branch of the cross motion of the defendant Meadowbrook Farking Area Contractors which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed with one bill…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Espinal v. Melville Snow Contractors, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Piacquadio v. Recine Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Riekers v. Gold Coast PlazaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weeman v. Rouse Si Shopping Center, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API