Magistad v. Andrew Schoch Grocery Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Action for an alleged balance of wages. The answer admitted the employment and alleged that at its termination the wages due were paid in cash in part and the balance in this manner: That plaintiff in the course of his employment drove one of defendant’s trucks so negligently that it collided with an automobile on a public street, breaking and damaging it in the sum of f28.50; that plaintiff fáiled to pay the damage so done, though payment was demanded; and that the owner of the automobile demanded payment of defendant, threatening suit if not made, by reason whereof defendant was compelled…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Harlan v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lunderberg v. BiermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. American Fidelity & Cas. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
- Turenne v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Allen v. Florida & Southern Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.