Legal Opinion
Rice v. . Ehele
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 27, 1874PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The order of which the defendants complained, is not that made by Justice JAMES on the 5th March, 1872, nor that made by Justice DOOLITTLE on the 18th May, 1872. The defendants had notice and were heard upon the granting of each of those. The complaint is of the order made by Justice DOOLITTLE on the 20th May, 1872, by which the defendants' answer was stricken out absolutely, and they absolutely precluded from making any defence in the action. The ground of complaint is, that the order was made without the defendants having been heard on the application therefor, and without notice to them.
It…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brinkley v. . BrinkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Gould v. . McCartyNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hanna v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Walker v. . WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Halgren v. HalgrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- First Nat. Bank v. FitzpatrickNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Auerbach v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.