Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Griffith v. Russell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 12, 1926No. 26,421PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action is one of mandamus to compel the board of county commissioners of Morton county to call an election to decide a proposition for removal of the county seat from Richfield to Elkhart.

The removal petition was filed with the board of county commissioners on April 6, 1925. The petition was prepared and presented pursuant to chapter 134 of the Laws of 1925. In July, 1925, the court determined two preliminary questions, as follows:

“Chapter 134 of the Laws of 1925 does not violate section 17 of article 2 of the constitution of this state.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Griffith v. RussellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wycoff v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  2. State ex rel. Duckworth v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API