People v. Jones
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Londrigan
The State appeals the trial court’s order suppressing evidence that had been seized as a result of two searches of the defendant’s car. Besides the merits of that order this appeal also raises a jurisdictional question regarding the steps taken by the State to present this issue here for review.
I
People v. Young (1980), 82 Ill. 2d 234, 412 N.E.2d 501, requires that the State, as a prerequisite to taking an interlocutory appeal of an order suppressing evidence, certify to the trial court that the suppression will substantially impair prosecution of the defendant. Several months after filing its…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. MartinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- People v. KantowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. HendricksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- People v. HatfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- People v. CarltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.