Legal Opinion

Dotson v. Daniel International Corp.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided April 10, 1981No. CIV-2-81-38PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NEESE, District Judge.

This is a removed, 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), diversity, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a)(1), (c), tort action for damages for wrongful death by a minor claiming to be the next-of-kin of her decedent the late Mr. David O. C. Dodson. The proposed intervenor a minor-female, claims also to be a next-of-kin of such decedent. It is undisputed that, if the applicant for intervention is a next-of-kin of such decedent, she is illegitimate.

Tennessee law provides the rules of decision herein. 28 U.S.C. § 1652. As presently applicable, the law of descent and distribution of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allen v. HarveyTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Sneed v. Henderson Ex Rel. HendersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Dilworth v. Tisdale Transfer & Storage CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Norman Purnell, Administrator of the Estate of Armstead Land, A/K/A Armstad Land v. City of Akron v. Damon Campbell Carissa CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API