Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McDuffee

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 5, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The defendant appeals under the provisions of G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G, from convictions on two indictments charging perjury (see G. L. c. 268, § 1A). The defendant argues on appeal that the trial judge erred in (1) denying his motion for a continuance; (2) denying his motions to dismiss and for a directed verdict; (3) withdrawing matters from, the jury’s consideration; and (4) denying his motion to revise and revoke the sentences imposed.

We conclude that there was no error. We briefly summarize the evidence presented at trial by the prosecution before turning to the defendant’s assignments…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McDuffeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Life Ins. Ass'n of Massachusetts v. Commr. of Ins.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Jones v. TaibbiDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1981
  4. Globe Newspaper Co. v. PokaskiDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API