Legal Opinion
Mohr v. McKenzie
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided December 2, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Trespass on. the Case, for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. George F. Blanke, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1895.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard
The appellants were boiler makers, and had taken a contract to furnish a new boiler to E. Rothschild & Bros., merchants in Chicago, at their place of business. The proposal of appellants to do the work, contained, in addition to the specifications for the boiler, the following :
“We will also put in new foundation for boiler and do all the necessary masonry for the same in a first-class manner.
For above boiler, full fire front, all necessary brick work and balance of trimmings, all as specified herein, new boiler delivered and set up and old boiler also removed, all for the sum of,” etc. •
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claflin v. DunneIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Scammon v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
- Pfau v. WilliamsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
- Andrews v. BoedeckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885
- Alling v. WenzellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pagan v. QuiñonesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1907
- Hoeft v. KockMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Pagan v. QuiñonesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1907