Lloyd v. Fendick
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 26, Jan. T., 1911, by plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Nov. T., 1910, No. 484, for defendant on case stated in suit of Mary A. Lloyd and Samuel J. Lloyd v. Jacob Fen-dick. Case stated in assumpsit for purchase price of real property. Before Newcomb, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Mestrezat,
This was an action of assumpsit to recover the purchase money due on articles of agreement by which the plaintiffs sold to the defendant certain real estate in the borough of Olyphant, Lackawanna county. The facts were submitted in a case stated for the decision of the court, and judgment was entered for the defendant. This motion of the court is the only error assigned.
By a writing dated June 13, 1910, treated as an article of agreement by the parties, the plaintiffs acknowledged the receipt-of $500 as a first payment on the purchase price of the property…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Hagy v. SharpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Fendick v. LloydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Kutz v. DeLong, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1937
- Stone v. RitzingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949