Legal Opinion

Thiel v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1931No. 5697PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, C. J.

—Plaintiff and respondent, Wilbur Thiel, entered into the following written contract with one Brown:

“This agreement made and entered into this 24 day of May 1928, by and between Albert Brown of Kimberly, Idaho, and hereinafter designated as the seller and Wilbur Thiel of Lemhi, Idaho, and hereinafter called the buyer, witnesseth:
“That said seller is to furnish 800 sacks of No. 1 seed potatoes, 105 pounds to the sack, and said buyer is to receive said potatoes and plant them and when dug this fall at the usual and regular digging time, he the said buyer will deliver to said seller, on board…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. D. M. Ferry & Co. v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clements Farms, Inc. v. Ben Fish & SonIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Schoonover v. Igleheart Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Clements Farms, Inc. v. Ben Fish & SonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Clements Farms, Inc. v. Ben Fish & SonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Clements Farms, Inc. v. Ben Fish & SonIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API