Legal Opinion

Smith v. Zell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1924No. Appeal, 309PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter,

This is an action by a real estate broker to recover commissions upon a sale of real estate, alleged to have been made through his agency. The employment of the plaintiff was oral, his agency was not exclusive and the fact that the owner had already placed the property in the hands of another real estate agency for sale was, at the trial, not disputed. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant and the plaintiff appeals.

We have in this case seventeen assignments of error, the majority of which refer to recitals of fact by the judge in his charge.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keys v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  2. Groskin v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Warne v. JohnstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Cathers v. PatchelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Barrow v. NewtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Follansbee EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Carr & McIlvain v. JakobySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API