Legal Opinion

Mesa Petroleum Co. v. Scheib

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 23, 1984No. 81-2462PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court which held that an oil and gas lease in Kansas contained provisions equivalent to a Pugh clause. This conclusion led to a division of the lease into two leases one covering the acreage pooled with other *615tracts and the other covering lands not pooled, with a holding that one had expired.

The basic lease provisions should, ordinarily, apply when there is a producing well on the lease as in the case before us, and the lease so extended in its entirety by production. This lease covers 600 contiguous acres. After a commercial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fawvor v. US Oil of Louisiana, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Jackson v. FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  3. Somers v. Harris Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
  4. Rogers v. Westhoma Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Egeland v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Mesa Petroleum Co. v. ScheibCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  3. EP Energy E&P Company, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API