Legal Opinion

A.A.P.S. v. Markwayne Mullin, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 22, 2026No. 1:26-cv-02929Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 A.A.P.S., Case No. 1:26-cv-02929-JLT-EPG 12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING THE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS, GRANTING 13 v. PETITIONER’S MOTION TO PROCEED VIA PSEUDONYM, AND DIRECTING 14 MARKWAYNE MULLIN, et al., RESPONDENTS TO PROVIDE A SUBSTANTIVE BOND HEARING 1 15 Respondents. (Docs. 1, 2, 3) 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Before the Court is A.A.P.S.’ request for a temporary restraining order (Doc. 2), filed in 19 conjunction with his petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

20 challenging his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. A.A.R.P. v. TrumpSupreme Court of the United States · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API